Question:

Americans are notorious for not speaking languages other than English. Do you think this mentality has hurt efforts to provide bilingual education?

Answer:

That’s possible. Most Americans don’t grow up knowing more than one language. Traditionally, most public schools have introduced a second language in high school.  That approach was based on poorly executed, old research from the 1970s. They thought it was too much of a cognitive load to introduce a second language to younger kids. 

Question:

When did that change?

Answer:

In the 1970s, there was a huge movement for education reform. Basically, the recommendation was “total immersion.” But that didn’t work, so by the 1980s, schools were shelling out tons of money for what was called bilingual education. A lot of it was going to English only, total immersion programs calling themselves bilingual.  That approach still wasn’t working, and people said we’re not going to throw money at something that isn’t working.

Question:

A lot of buzzwords and fads, but not much real change.

Answer:

The change came later, with ESL (English as a Second Language). Kids are taken out part of the day and taught in their native language, and put back in the classroom. The problem is that they feel ostracized, and they’re not getting enough time learning the content of the classes. ESL is still our “go to” program in the U.S.  It’s not working, and it’s tough on kids emotionally. Here in Merced County, there are kids who are not allowed to speak Spanish in pre-school.

So that’s the dichotomy: Research in neuroscience and cognition tells us that dual language kids have an advantage, yet bilingual students aren’t doing well in our system.

All those benefits come to someone who is proficient in both languages. These students are not proficient. Their problems affect everyone, not only society in general, but also schools, because there is an impact on budgets. The money lost in public education comes from kids repeating grades and dropping out, and most of those kids are non-native English speakers.  

Question:

Why did you decide to focus your research on pre-school?

Answer:

That’s where reform can have the most impact. Language acquisition is easiest before the age of 5, yet non-native English speakers are less likely to attend pre-school because there’s no language support. Also there are tremendous short- and long-term benefits to attending pre-school. Children who attend pre-school are less likely to be involved in incidents of delinquency and drop out of high school.

Question:

What do you say to parents who are threatened by the idea of a bilingual component in their children's school?

Answer:

When it comes to problem solving and hypothesis testing, bilinguals come up with significantly more solutions. They’re more creative and more out of the box. This is good for math, language and art. If you think about it, they have two conceptual stores to pull from. That cognitive flexibility gives them an advantage. The other thing you see — this is fairly new research — is earlier development of theory of mind, essentially being aware that other people may think or feel differently.

Question:

Do the benefits of bilingualism show up in adulthood?

Answer:

New research into Alzheimer’s and memory loss suggests bilinguals may be better able to retain their memories, and that bilingualism may actually help with degenerative brain diseases.

Question:

Does your own background help you in your work? You grew up with an Iranian mother, mostly on U.S. military bases abroad.

Answer:

I spoke Farsi and German, but when we moved back to the U.S. my parents spoke English and dropped the other languages. I only remember a few words of Farsi. When I talk to parents of Spanish-speaking kids and tell them that by speaking Spanish at home they’re actually giving kids cognitive benefits, their faces light up.

Five-year-olds might have less going on in their lives than adults, which makes it easier for them, too. But for adults, it’s never too late to learn a second language.